Logistics in the Korean War: The Right Analogy?

Source: Truman Library, Online Archives, “Prospects for Survival of the Republic of Korea,” Office of Reports and Estimates 44-48, October 28, 1948 https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/research-files/prospects-survival-republic-korea-office-reports-and-estimates-44-48?documentid=NA&pagenumber=13h

When looking at current military scenarios in the Pacific, the experiences of the Second World War tend to be the archetype for lessons learned and exploring possible avenues of approach…maybe the real historical parallel is Korea?

Analogies at War

In the book, Analogies at War, author Yuen Khong makes a similar claim for the Vietnam War. While the Johnson administration, focused on the analogy of Munich Conference of 1938, and the failure of Europe to stand up to Hitler, Khong argues for a different tack. Analogies at War makes the compelling case that had senior policy makers used the Korean War and the French experience during Dien Bien Phu as the analytical framework, the US may have had a better strategic outcome.

Over the past week, I spent time combing various primary source archives looking at the planning and execution of logistics during the Korean War. My previous scholarship in the Pacific focused on the Solomon Islands campaign in 1942-1943. From my view, the distances, austere locations, and severe environment placed unique and challenging requirements on the supply chains of American and Japanese forces. Therefore, the Solomons Campaign represented the heuristic for thinking about future problems of logistics.

The challenge of supporting South Korea

A Destroyed Society

Digging into the primary sources for the Korean War, there is much more that is applicable to the problems of logistics in 2023, than I had imagined. A good example is the source above: a page from a Central Intelligence Group overall assessment of the Korean Peninsula, in 1948, two years before the war. In this analysis, the group states that South Korea lacked economic, political, and military resources due to Japanese occupation and the devastation of the Second World War. As a result, “all weapons, ammunition, and equipment must be supplied by sources outside the country, probably by the US.” Far from being a Top Ten economy in the world, as South Korea is today, the nation lacked .

A Creeping Fatalism

The distance to Korea, the need to harness allied capability, from foodstuffs to basing, and the requirement to start from limited means, all mirror common problems in power projection today. In many of the primary documents there was a resignation, well before the war starts in 1950, that keeping North Korea (with Soviet backing) at bay, was beyond the ability of the US military. The Commanding General of XXIV Corps in Korea wrote an update to Gen Macarthur in September 1945, “The general situation in Southern Korea is compared to a Powder Keg…the splitting of Korea into two parts for an occupation by force…is impossible.”* Much of this fatalism hinged on the horrific economic conditions and the lack of a military establishment in South Korea.

In 1950, the US military would have to accomplish the task these memospredicted, supplying and transporting almost all of the allied needs for the war. Although it is cliché to call the Korean War–the Forgotten War. In terms of logistics it could be true. More to follow.

*(Truman archives, War Department Incoming Classified Message, Sep 18, 1945).

The Wilderness at the End of the World

Library of Congress, Geography and Map Division, Louisiana: European Explorations and the Louisiana Purchase.
http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gmd/g3300.np000009

Map of British North America, 1755, Commissioned by British Lords of Trade

When the Seven Years War in North America began in 1755 with General William Braddock’s arrival in Virginia that spring, the colonies occupied only a silver of settlements hugging the ocean. The map above shows the British view of their possessions at the start of the Seven Years War. The straight lines and clear demarcation with different colors between the colonies was a political and geographic fantasy. In reality 95% of the colonists lived to the East (to the right) of the black line. The British controlled very little of North America that did not hug the coastline. Although some of the limitation of colonial movement west was in part due to the difficulty of geography, the power of Native American tribes was the real factor. As documented by Alan Taylor and recently by Pekka Hamalainen in Indigenous Continent, native empires halted colonial settlement.

This territorial and cultural divide limited what colonists and the British leadership understood about the geography to their West. For example, in 1758, Governor William Denny of Philadelphia sent Frederick Post to meet with Teedyuscung, a Lenape Chief, to ascertain the possibility of establishing an alliance with the tribe. Although less than 80 miles from Philadelphia, Post describes the journey almost as if he is exploring another planet. His companions on the trip lamented the difficulties and expressed concern about the dangers they faced. As they pushed north of Bethlehem, Post met a Lt. Patterson who “painted the danger of our undertaking in very frightful colors.” He also received intelligence from some local warriors that war would be over soon “For there are but few, whom the devil rides.” At the point the war had three more years of tough campaigning ahead.

Lt. Post “Journal of Frederick Post’s Journey from Philadelphia, June 20, 1758.” Huntington Library Archives, Abercromby Collection

The frightful colors Lt. Patterson spoke of where the vast unknown regions of the map. Although a small snippet of the large war, Post’s diary illustrates how ill-informed the colonial government was of the regions more than a day’s ride into the wilderness. Although drawn on maps back in Europe as belonging to the British, the old Northwest was owned by the Indigenous tribes.

This cultural barrier between the colonists and the territory abutting their settlements created a critical gap of knowledge for the British campaign that made moving and sustaining their forces all the more difficult. Even though Post’s journey was three years after Braddock’s loss, the British still lacked the critical information as to who their native allies were (and were not), and thus how to move and protect their own lines of communication.

For Braddock’s march this lack of information led to a slow and arduous effort to carve a 200 mile by 12-foot road from Maryland to the French position at Fort Duquesne (modern-day Pittsburgh). Due to the difficulty, Braddock split his columns, faster combat troops leaving a larger supply train behind, to speed his army. Although this plan worked, and Braddock arrived near the Monongahela with his troops mostly fed and disease free, his inability to understand the topography and harness native alliances left a glaring gap in his security. As a result, his large column of wagons and soldiers were an easy mark for the French and their native allies at the Monongahela. And to make matters worse, the humiliating loss allowed the French to translate the logistics that Braddock lost into diplomatic favor and military power from native tribes. French-aligned native warriors attacked the colonial frontiers and pushed them further to the ocean, torching homesteads within 20 miles of Philadelphia.

In a cruel twist of fate, lack of cultural understanding hampered British intelligence, which in turn left them venerable to attack on their own logistics. The French then turned that same logistics back into diplomatic and military power to halt British advances and keep the threat of raided supply lines for the remainder of the war. As Post’s journal shows, even three years after Braddock’s defeat, the British still suffered from a dearth of understanding about the peoples and territories at the edge of their maps. In 1758, without intelligence and with a large gap of understanding between native tribes, colonists, and the Crown, the British chose a path of brute force. Substituting money, soldiers, forts, and supplies for allies.

Allies and Partners: “It’s Complicated” even in the 18th Century

By February 1757, the Seven Years War in North America (also called The French and Indian War) had stalled. Although the British Navy commanded the seas, the French with their vast contacts to several Native American Empires and their command of internal waterways, stymied the British in all directions. Gen Braddock suffered a humiliating defeat at the Monongahela just short of Fort Duquesne (Pittsburgh) in 1755.

French General Montcalm, in turn, used the largess gained Braddock’s loss to gain native allies and hold off the British all across the Great Lakes. Even the victories on the south shore of Lake George, New York in 1755, proved pyrrhic for the British. They were able to build forts but could not take the fight northward. Spending great expenses and keeping the forts occupied and sustained over hostile territory. The French and Indigenous control of the waterways and wilderness made the taking and holding of territory difficult and expensive.

Map of Seven Years War in North America, Major Battles and Cities. (Wikimedia Commons)

William Pitt: Stick and Carrot or just a Stick?

In this environment, William Pitt, the Secretary of State for the British, wrote a letter encouraging the Governor of Pennsylvania (William Denny) to raise and pay for an Army to support the planned campaign into French-Canada the following summer.

William Pit, 1754, Wikimedia Commons

Pitt wrote his letter in pointed fashion. Eschewing the classic positive-negative-positive diplomatic format (in a modern colloquialism the “poop sandwich”), he gave William Denny only the negative.

He began:

“The King, having nothing more at heart than the preservation of his good subjects & Colonies of North America; has come to a revolution of acting with the greatest vigor in those parts, the ensuing campaign; all necessary preparations are making for sending a considerable reinforcement of troops together with a strong squadron of ships, for that purpose, and in order to act offensively against the French.”*

Translation: George III, is spending precious capital on soldiers/ships to take the fight to Canada (vs. the stalemate of ~ 18 months).

Pitt then minces no words and directs Governor Denny:

“And the King doubts not but that the several provinces, holy sensible of his paternal care in sending so large a force for their security will exert their utmost endeavor (emphasis added)…not delay the entitlements of their men or…the money for their pay with such limitations…hitherto found to render their service difficult and ineffectual…I am to acquaint you, that the training of the men, their pay, and clothing will be all that will be required for their campaign on that part of the several provinces, measures having been already taken for laying up Magazines of stores and provisions of all kinds at the Expense of the Crown.”*

Translation: Britain continues to invest a significant sum in the defense of Pennsylvania. We are paying for sustainment and arms costs. You owe us soldiers and must pay them enough so they do not leave during the campaign season and return home.

Pitt ends with a final deterrent:

“I am likewise to acquaint you that the Earl of Loudon is directed to send forthwith to Virginia a battalion of regular forces to be employed as the exigency shall require for the succor & defence of…any other of the Southern Colonies.”*

Translation: If you cannot get your colonial army organized, we will send regular British forces away from the Northern colonies to the South.

Thus, despite the colonists being under the control of Britain, and subjects themselves, Pitt still had to negotiate. He uses the promise of economic and military support for the war and the deterrent of disappointment by the King and the possibility of precious troops moved elsewhere.

*Excerpts taken from “William Pitt to the Governor of Pennsylvania, 4 Feb 1757” from the online archive collection at the University of Pittsburgh.

Original document at the link below (Note Pitt’s neat handwriting–always impressive by modern standards):

https://digital.library.pitt.edu/islandora/object/pitt%3A31735060226416/viewer#page/2/mode/2up